Re: [boost] [ongoing review of binary_int] reviewers for small utility wanted

Paul Mensonides <pmenso57 <at> comcast.net> writes:

It is possible, but requires quite a few more macros to implement (approximately double). How about:

BOOST_BINARY_LITERAL(...) BOOST_BINARY_LITERAL_U(...) BOOST_BINARY_LITERAL_L(...) BOOST_BINARY_LITERAL_UL(...)

(etcetera, if we need/want long long support)

It looks nice.

All of these are easy to implement. BTW, is there any reason why we couldn't go with just 'BOOST_BINARY'?

This one is even better. -- Alexander Nasonov