Re: [boost] Boost.Uuid and header-only support

James E. King, III wrote:

I'm not certain that it is necessary to make random_generator a separate class like this.

If it's documented as an instance of basic_random_generator<>, making it later not an instance would be a breaking change. It's also possible to document it as typedef /*unspecified*/ random_generator; but then we need to specify its interface by basically repeating that same class definition.