-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Cédric Venet Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 2:19 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [GTL] - geometric template library - determininginterest
For what I can understand you have one class 'b' in B library that you want to use with alghoritms of _both_ A and B library the pattern is:
1 - get the class 'a' subclassing 'b'; class a : b 2 - add to 'a' interfaces to deal with algorithms of library A 3 - implement that interfaces using methods of 'b' and/or functions of library B acting on 'b' 4 - use 'a' with library A using the above interface 5 - use 'a' with library B because base class of 'a' is a 'b' Is this interpretation correct ?
Quoting John Femiani <JOHN.FEMIANI@asu.edu>:
So the "concept" is also an "adapter"?
I think a is more like a ConceptMap (basicaly an adapter to a concept) and it was clear from a previous mail that it was considered like this (the code sample was something like PointConceptMap). I suppose ConceptMap just became Concept during the discution.
-- Cédric
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[John quickly reviews concept maps] So then is it fair to say that GTL will provide ConceptMap features compatible with current compilers? Is BGL hoping to become Boost.ConceptMap + Boost.Point + Boost.RectilinearRegion ? I saw some code in this thread where concepts were used in assertions -- is supposed to be a GTL version of the concept axioms proposed for c++0x? -- John