Larry Evans wrote:
On 02/14/2005 06:48 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
benchmarks would not be immediately necessary. Please see my other post: "Fusion plan".
I searched for "Fusion plan" in subject, but that showed nothing. Then I looked at all of your posts for the last month, but none looked promising.
Could you give more details so I can find it?
I just posted it. You should see it by now. If not: Here's what I am planning: 1) I intend to refactor fusion to allow different forms of containers with varying characteristics. I plan to have: a) vector b) list c) set d) map 2) The unifying force is the (as usual): iterator 3) There will be intrinsic functions that work on specific containers (e.g. cons for lists; thus having full backward compatibility with old tuples). 4) As I intend to follow the MPL mold, I will follow MPL naming convention (e.g. "at" instead of "get", vector instead of tuple). 5) Provide a tuple TR1 interface on top of fusion. 6) Provide a backward compatible interface (for old tuples) on top of fusion. I'd like to hear your thoughts. Cheers, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net