| -----Original Message----- | From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org | [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental | Sent: 08 February 2006 15:05 | To: boost@lists.boost.org | Subject: Re: [boost] [Test] Link succeeds without | BOOST_TEST_MAIN defined | | > For me, BOOST_TEST_MAIN sounds like one is defining a | "main" function. I | > guess this relates to the naming issue we discussed | earlier. I saw your | > posting about BOOST_TEST_MODULE, which sounds better. | | BOOST_TEST_MAIN mark one of the files as main in multifiles | test module. But | it does not affect the master test suite name. | BOOST_TEST_MODULE names | master test suite and also enforce BOOST_TEST_MAIN since only | one "main" | file could name the master test suite. So would BOOST_TEST_MODULE be better named BOOST_TEST_MASTER_SUITE? (And if no parameter provided, then it is called "Master Test Suite" But if BOOST_TEST_MASTER_SUITE "My Test Master Suite" then called My Test Master Suite Or am I still confused? Paul -- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB Phone and SMS text +44 1539 561830, Mobile and SMS text +44 7714 330204 mailto: pbristow@hetp.u-net.com http://www.hetp.u-net.com/index.html http://www.hetp.u-net.com/Paul%20A%20Bristow%20info.html