16 Nov
2012
16 Nov
'12
2:23 p.m.
On 16/11/12 15:13, Beman Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
On 15/11/12 21:10, Darren Garvey wrote:
I agree. The top-level directory is overpopulated.
What's wrong with it? If it's going to be in the top-level boost namespace, it might as well be a top-level file too.
We are in process of modularizing boost libraries because lumping all of boost into a single repo, or tarball, or whatever doesn't scale.
So think about the future - in a modularized boost where the top-level is really just references to libraries, what library does this belong in?
It can be in any module. Surely any module can add files anywhere, as long as two modules do not have files with conflicting names.