Marco Costalba wrote:
I wanted to add the final touch, from :
[snip]
But i have a strange compile error.
As I said in my other post, it's better not to rely on mpl or fusion for low level libs like this. I gave a proof of concept. The challenge is to make it complete. The ideal is to: 1) Not rely on any libraries at all except boost.function whereby making it trim and clean (it's ok to use Boost PP**). Yep, you can get rid of the need for tuples, but if that makes it too painful, I guess it's ok to use it. It's a fairly simple class anyway. 2) Another challenge is to make it usable on as many compilers as possible. The first ideal is more important that this one. Perhaps it's ok to forget antiquated compilers without partial specialization, etc. (**You'll still have to expand the overload_function(s) for N arguments, where N is the maximum the library can handle) Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net