At Tuesday 2004-07-27 02:38, you wrote:
Le mar 27/07/2004 à 11:02, Victor A. Wagner Jr. a écrit :
Boost.numeric.interval library fails when included in uBLAS due to a curious namespace problem. http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/output/ RudbekAssociates-bin-boost-libs-numeric-ublas-test7-test-vc8-0-debug.html
The same problem effect VC 7.1 as well. Why the compilers think the 'lower' 'upper' symbols are ambiguous I have no idea!
because there are two different ones to choose from
Could you please explain why there are two different ones to choose from in the first place? I don't understand why the compiler looks for boost::numeric::ublas::lower. If VC is right, please tell me so that I submit bug-reports to GCC and ICC (since they don't see it).
from my quick test (I tried to FORCE the "local" lower) it had better see it because the local one caused an error. I'll have to run that test again tho (I believe I commented on it several days ago when I originally tried to fix it)
Regards,
Guillaume
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"