Thanks for the suggestions. First I thought about physically remove "Boost" prefix from the name (and have done it to my website). Your suggestions sounds better, so i can keep the name while adding a notice in header in the doc saying "it is not boost library yet...". On 6/11/07, Giovanni Piero Deretta <gpderetta@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/10/07, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote:
Since no one has mentioned it before <http://www.boost.org/more/discussion_policy.htm#lib_names>. On 6/11/07, Yigong Liu <yigongliu@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks for the reminder. I'll remove "Boost" from the library name.
Quoting from the linked page:
"Note that this policy only applies to discussions, not to the documentation, directory structure, or even identifiers in the code of potential Boost libraries."
So I think that keeping that name in the library and in the documentation (maybe modulo a notice that says that the library has not yet been accepted) is fine. You just need to say "the proposed Boost Join library" when discussing it on the mailing list or elsewhere. May be that was exactly what you meant, but I just wanted to clarify.
HTH,
gpd _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost