Daryle Walker ha escrito:
On 6/22/04 10:13 AM, "Joaquín Mª López Muñoz" <joaquin@tid.es> wrote:
John Maddock ha escrito:
Some months ago I proposed to include a defect macro to detect some defficiencies by several compilers regarding the ability to handle pointers to data members as template parameters.
The name we came up with is
BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS
[...]
Is it OK to add this to Boost.Config? Comment?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OK, added as requested.
Fine, thanks! I'll be updating my docs to reflect this.
Shouldn't it be BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS instead? Or does it also apply to pointers-to-member-function?
Umm, no, it only applies to pointers to data members. In my discharge, I'd say that the defect macro BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_MEMBER_CONST only applies to pointers to member functions, and the name does not make it clear this, either. Anyway, I agree with you that your proposal is clearer. I'll stick to whatever is finally decided. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo