2011/6/20 Gwenio <urulokiurae@gmail.com>:
On 6/20/2011 11:25 AM, pavel wrote:
perhaps my opinion is biased by qt framework influence but it's a very mature product with 15 years of development history so i think they know what they are doing
i think it's a mistake to try to do everything at compile time
let's say half of the time the gui elements are dynamic in runtime sense
so the compile-time-magic code would be used only roughly in 50% of cases while the runtime api should be there anyway
On the other hand, if the compile time bindings are well done then it should be possible to tie them to facilities capable of changing dynamically at runtime allowing the library to provide the best of both.
And that's what I think. I want to make possible to override compile-time behaviour, but let's start with simple things first. And I also thought of mapping the compile time to a spirit language, but that's very far from what I'm thinking now because first I want to see how it behaves an embedded language in C++.