On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Roland Bock <rbock@eudoxos.de> wrote:
Andrey Semashev wrote:
On 03/09/2010 10:48 PM, Michael Caisse wrote:
Andrey Semashev wrote:
These parsers do, indeed, give a hard time to compilers. I tried to reduce the footprint but apparently some compilers still barely cope with them. Not sure what can be done, but I'll try to experiment some more. Suggestions from Boost.Spirit gurus are welcome. :)
Would you be willing to move to Spirit 2.1 and away from classic? I could offer a patch once my work load frees up some.
If it does offer better compile times, I'm willing to try. I just haven't had any real experience with Spirit 2.x before. The patch would be much appreciated. :)
There's a page with migration hints:
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_41_0/libs/spirit/doc/html/spirit/notes/porti...
I assume that the Spirit experts will be able to re-write that code with ease.
Why yes, yes we can. :) I did not know you were using a rather ancient version, I would have rewritten that already if I knew you were using Spirit at all. I have not been paying too much attention to all this review process, so if you can give me the SVN link to the latest version, I can rewrite the Spirit code to use the *much* faster Spirit2.1, it will both compile and execute faster, and I can submit a patch. I am craving doing some programming. Been *so* busy with stuff recently that I have not been able to do much, other then moving in to my new place I actually have some free time again so I can do this.