Jeff Garland wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:41:49 -0400, Howard Hinnant wrote
On Jun 2, 2005, at 11:17 AM, Rene Rivera wrote:
There are some failures for date_time with CW-9 (and similar errors in CW-8):
CW-9.5 on Mac... http://tinyurl.com/bwhsw http://tinyurl.com/93nh4
CW-9.4 on Windows... http://tinyurl.com/75t78 http://tinyurl.com/br2b5
CW-8.3 on Windows... http://tinyurl.com/85nf5 http://tinyurl.com/9gfpn
They have this as the reason:
"[ J. Garland ] Some older compilers are confused by the template code here. These are new features to date-time in 1.33 and there is no plan to backport to these non-compliant compilers."
Now I don't particularly think of CW-9 as an "older" compiler. So is that really the reason? Or is it just that it hasn't been investigated?
Still waiting for a response to the above errors.
I just took a look at http://tinyurl.com/9y4td and it looks to me
OK, a different error :-) [...]
You can find the code in boost/date_time/gregorian/gregorian_io.hpp - line 100. It's likely, however, that it is macro'ed out because if BOOST_NO_STD_LOCALE is defined this code will not be included. [...] So my suspicion is that the real issue here is the failure comment is misleading, or the configuration is in error. Do we need to change the config option to let the locale-based code compile?
No. Howard is pointing out an error on CW-9 which doesn't have the locale problem that CW-8 has. All the tests for CW-9 run with locales enabled. But now that I know I'll at the corresponding CW-8 tests and enable locale support on those tests. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org