10 Mar
2005
10 Mar
'05
9:35 p.m.
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
Maybe the following approach could be taken to allow for alternative implementations to be plugged into the framework: [...]
unordered_set<my_type,boost::hash<my_type,crypto_impl> > us;
The proposal is not a framework, it contains two simple tools for constructing hash_value overloads for compound types and a suite of _default_ hash functions. Alternative implementations (who may or may not use the supplied tools) are supported by unordered_set by simply using unordered_set< my_type, my_hash > us; There's no need to plug them in.