On Sun, 4 Aug 2013, at 12:20 PM, Daniel James wrote:
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013, at 12:00 PM, Bo Persson wrote:
Daniel James skrev 2013-08-04 10:57:
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013, at 10:22 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
What do you think about increasing the compiler requirement much more, as I wrote in another mail?
I'd say no, unless you've got a very good reason. Compiler support should be an individual library maintainers decision.
Should it? If one library can be dependent on 35 others (boost::any?) it sure seems like an agreed upon base line could be useful.
That's an extra responsibility that the maintainer of boost::any takes on. That's surely well understood by now.
Sorry, I confused dependents and dependencies there. The maintainer of Any can choose its dependencies. Btw. how did you get 35 for boost::any?