On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 15:52 +0300, Peter Dimov wrote:
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Well, first it looked like that whe have a very similar problem with our code than in the shared_ptr_test (did not dig deeper into both yet):
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault si_code: 1 - SEGV_MAPERR - Address not mapped to object. 0x5c17e30 in <unknown_procedure> () (gdb)
But now, as the shared_ptr_test works with -O2 (at least for me), I just tried our code with -O2, and it still does not work. So it also could be another (gcc?)problem than for the shared_ptr_test.
Does it still not work with BOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS or BOOST_SP_USE_PTHREADS defined? If so, it's a general problem, not caused by the platform-specific atomics; it could be a compiler backend bug, and should probably be reported to the GCC Bugzilla. Can you try a 4.x g++? It might have even been fixed.
shared_ptr_test still fails with HP's gcc-4.1.1 (depot, installs to /opt/hp-gcc). But curious, with self-built gcc-4.1.1 (using GNU-as from binutils 2.16.1, native ld), shared_ptr_test works both with -O2 and -O0. Now going for the application test.
The Boost test pages are at
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/
linked from the main page, top right corner.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost