On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti <lorcaminiti@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Michael and thank you for bring my attention back to your original reply on this topic.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Dean Michael Berris <mikhailberis@gmail.com> wrote:
So applying my logic to the discussion on Boost.Local, I see it as doing a not-so-good job of doing #1
Let me understand better your point. Is this because Boost.Local functions cannot be declared within expressions while C++11 lambdas can?
Yes and a lot more. It's because Boost.Local functions aren't real local functions and because it doesn't do anything that C++11 lambdas don't already do.
while falling short in #2. If
Again, let me understand your point better. Is this because Boost.Local functions use macros?
Not just that. It's also because it's trying to approximate something limited as compared to what C++11 already has. Cheers -- Dean Michael Berris http://goo.gl/CKCJX