"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> wrote in message news:cvvvpc$ipt$1@sea.gmane.org...
Andy Little wrote:
"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger@neoscientists.org> wrote
It shows me that I have to write more tests/examples, very soon...
From what I have seen its very cool. :-)
How does this play with boost::result_of. Is there any potential to extend result_of by this?
result_of should already get the right answers for these types.
#include <iostream> #include "boost/utility/result_of.hpp" // v 1.32.0 // BTW following requires #include "boost/function_types/function_type_parameter.hpp" #include "boost/function_types/function_type_result.hpp" typedef int f(int); int main() { // fails (Vc7.1, gcc3.2) // typedef boost::result_of<f>::type result_type; //succeeds(Vc7.1, gcc3.2) typedef boost::function_types::function_type_result< f >::type result_type; std::cout << typeid(result_type).name() <<'\n'; } regards Andy Little