David Crayford ha escrito:
2. Compile your test code with a compiler switch defining the macro BOOST_IBMCPP to 600. I think in your case the compiler switch is -DBOOST_IBMCPP=600 3. Shake and serve.
Bah! It didn't fix my problem, getting the following errors (same as before):
"/FTS1/tmp/doc/boost/mpl/aux_/integral_wrapper.hpp", line 85.30: CCN5431 (S) The declarator cannot be qualified with the enclosing namespace "mpl_".
"/FTS1/tmp/doc/boost/mpl/aux_/integral_wrapper.hpp", line 85.30: CCN5431 (S) The declarator cannot be qualified with the enclosing namespace "mpl_".
If I change BOOST_IBMCPP to < 600 I get the following errors:
"/FTS1/tmp/doc/boost/multi_index/detail/node_type.hpp", line 56.39: CCN5063 (S) The text "<" is unexpected. "/FTS1/tmp/doc/boost/multi_index/detail/base_type.hpp", line 54.40: CCN5063 (S) The text "<" is unexpected.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
David, I'm afraid I don't have a clue... The local changes you've done seem to be having effect, since the behavior is different for different values of BOOST_IBMCPP, so I think we can rule out some missing detail in the test process. Just to make sure, can you add an explicit #error preprocessor directive at line 69 of boost/mpl/aux_/integral_wrapper.hpp? If the error pops up on compilation then the local patch is working as expected (i.e. the correct workaround in that file is being used.) Sorry I cannot provide more helpful suggestions. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo