2010/3/9 Agustín K-ballo Bergé <kaballo86@hotmail.com>:
El 09/03/2010 06:53 a.m., Emil Dotchevski escribió:
2010/3/8 Agustín K-ballo Bergé <kaballo86@hotmail.com>: Here is a small example that does not compile, however different from what I initially report. it may be even illegal code?
#include <boost/la/col.hpp> #include <boost/la/mat.hpp> #include <boost/la/vec.hpp>
int main() { using namespace boost::la;
mat< float, 4, 4 > m = {}; vec< float, 4 > v = {}; ( m | col< 0 >() ) = v; }
You need more/different includes, mat_traits.hpp includes mat.hpp, the motivation being that if you just need the type definition you don't have to include the rest of the (Boost) LA stuff: #include <boost/la/col.hpp> #include <boost/la/mat_traits.hpp> #include <boost/la/vec_traits.hpp> #include <boost/la/vector_assign.hpp> int main() { using namespace boost::la; mat< float, 4, 4 > m = {}; vec< float, 4 > v = {}; m|col<0>() = v; } Also note that the actual syntax is m|col<0> = v, the () is only needed on MSVC due to a compiler bug.
· I would like to have X, Y, Z and W placeholders be convertible to the axis versor. However I don't think this can be actually implemented. Maybe something like versor<float,3>( X ) or unit_vector<float,3>( X ) would be better. Could you provide an example of what you want exactly? vec< float, 3 > const x_axis = unit_vector< float, 3 >( X ); // x_axis == { 1.f, 0.f, 0.f }
I'd rather use unit_x<float,3>() what do you think? Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode