Larry Evans wrote:
* What is your evaluation of the documentation?
Needs some work. Details on what work provided by my previous posts and the current attachment.
Thanks for these fixes, I'm currently incorporating them into the documentation.
* Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems?
Yes, with the g++ compiler, version 3.3.4. However, as noted by other respondents, the boost filesystem doesn't believe character, +, is valid filename character; yet, some g++ system header filenames include that character.
Another problem was that my wave took about 4 minutes while using most of the cpu before aborting when parsing a BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS call.
I really would like to further investigate this. I plan to build Wave here on my Windows machine with Cygwin to try to reproduce your problem. I'll get back to you as soon as I have any new results.
* Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library? Be sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments don't obscure your overall opinion.
Most definitely, but I'd sure like some help getting wave to work for me. I suspect I've done something wrong since Paul Mensonides has obviously used it to do something more complicated than BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS :(
Thanks! Defintely it is usable in more sophisticated contexts, even if it is slower than gcc. Regards Hartmut