On 10/4/15 6:50 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
I have started to inspect the documentation which is BTW quite large as often on this kind of libraries, as there are a lot of little functions. I have opened some issues on the GitHub repository, and I suggest to those interested in the library to do the same. This will help us to know what needs to be done before going to a Boost review. For the time being you can add the library on the review schedule if not already done.
I would like to second this suggestion. I'm a great believer in the boost formal review system. I think it would work even better if authors can get some feedback BEFORE the formal review. So, if you've taken the time to look at this library, I think you can be of great help by communicating your impressions to the author. This will give him a chance to make some tweaks before the review. Robert Ramey