The functions generated by static lambda will be very similar to C functions. It would not bind any data. Runtime cost of static lambda expression is zero. On 6/26/07, Alexander Nasonov <alnsn@yandex.ru> wrote:
I couldn't find out quickly if you're applying BOOST_TYPEOF to passed lambda expression but if you do, it would blow up your computer if compiler doesn't support native typeof (Hint: try passing -DBOOST_TYPEOF_COMPLIANT to compiler's arguments).
Have you considered something like
int (*static_fun)(int const&, int const&) = (_1 + _2 + 3).get_static_function(1, 2);
get_static_function does not necessarily accept values, it may have a different interface: (_1 + _2 + 3).get_static_function<int const&, int const&>(); (_1 + _2 + 3).get_static_function(mpl::vector<int const&, int const&>());
Does your idea help to improve performance and/or reduce size of program that has a lot of conversions from lambda expressions to tr1::function?
26.06.07, 17:31, Atry <pop.atry@gmail.com>:
I wrote a intial version, I have tested it on cygwin ported gcc 3.4.4and msvc 7.1, for more infomation, see README and tests in zip packet in vault.
http://boost-consulting.com/vault/index.php?direction=0&order=&directory=Generic%20Programming
On 6/25/07, Atry <pop.atry@gmail.com> wrote:
-- Alexander Nasonov _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost