15 Dec
2004
15 Dec
'04
6:20 p.m.
Andras Erdei wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:30:55 -0700, Jonathan Turkanis <technews@kangaroologic.com> wrote:
I agree with many of your points, except the main one: that Boost.Rational with built-in intergal types is useless without rounding.
if you are really, really convinced that this is the case,
That what is the case?
there is a code snippet at http://www.ccg.hu/pub/src/rat.cpp -- it shows that the current finite precision boost::rational semantics can be implemented a lot more efficiently
Thank you. I'll take a careful look at it as soon as I am a little less far behind on my current projects. Jonathan