
21 Nov
2007
21 Nov
'07
7:02 p.m.
AMDG Sven Van Echelpoel <sven.vanechelpoel <at> telenet.be> writes:
Gee, thanks for jumping on this so quickly! I wanted to apply your findings to a solution, but then I realized what stumped me in the first place: this code can be pretty obscure I wanted to correct s_item's type typedef by replacing it with something like element_type, until I saw that type is already a typedef for item_type. Still I'm gonna proceed and see how far that gets me. I'll keep you posted.
I think you can just use mpl::set0<> instead of mpl::set<>. That will solve you're particular problem. In Christ, Steven Watanabe