On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Jonathan Franklin <franklin.jonathan@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Tom Brinkman <reportbase2007@gmail.com> wrote:
... All I'm saying is that in the real world, most projects are mixed C/C++ and that the needs of both communities need to be addressed if boost is going to remain relevent.
For the sake of not arguing, let's assume that your assertion is true. Let's hear your *actionable* proposal for improving boost. E.g. show us the better interface for <insert specific boost example here>.
Tom's observations are just that, observations. In my experience, they are correct. It doesn't mean that actionable proposals are practical or possible. Frankly, I couldn't care less if a particular team uses Boost or not, unless I am writing code that they use. And then I keep my fingers crossed that I will be able to use shared_ptr at least. :) Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode