Re: [boost] [result_of] now uses decltype on release branch

[Part 3 of 3] Daniel Walker wrote:

3) Non-class prvalues and cv-qualification

Since this C++11 behavior was proposed later than N3276, it's possible that there is a non-C++11-compliant compiler that implements N3276 but not (3). Would it be better to emulate (3) when using decltype-based result_of? But then boost::result_of returns different results than those of std::result_of on compilers that do not implement (3). Regards, Michel