On 5/17/11 1:34 PM, Vicente Botet wrote:
Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
Hey everyone!
I don't know what the protocol is for this, but since I have been posting occasionally for a while and have offered to be a Review Manager but am relatively unknown to the community (which, again, means that I will completely understand and won't be offended in the slightest if you politely decline my offer to be a Review Manager :-) ) and have never introduced myself I figured that now might be as good a time as any:
Hi Gregory,
I appreciate a lot the comments you have been done lastly. I'm sure you will play more than correctly the Review Manager role.
If you want to manage a review I suggest you to first choose one library you think has the Boost quality and you are comfortable with the domain. Then contact the author and propose you as review manager.
If you want to help the Boost community you can also write some reviews.
Thank you for the support, Vicente! :-) In fact, on this list I have specifically offered in the past to be a Review Manager for the Boost::Local library, and now that it has made it into the queue Lorenzo has accepted my offer. One caveat I should mention in the interest of full disclosure is that I am also a user of Boost::Local and have been an advocate of getting this library included in Boost in the past so my personal feelings on the matter are not neutral, but as a Review Manager I would of course put these feelings aside to analyze and summarize the consensus opinion dispassionately, even it turned out to be against accepting Boost::Local. Cheers, Greg