Hi Lars,
I don't know if this has been raised before in the discussion of previous versions, but it's customary to not call something just "Boost.Whatever" if it's not an actual accepted Boost library.
Thanks for the warning!
From now on I will always use: "Proposed Boost.Application Library"
You should probably not use the actual Boost logotype in the documentation either...
I used the Quickbook to generate the documentation. Quickbook adds 'boost' logotype automatically. Is there any way I can generate the documentation using the Quickbook, that does not include the 'boost' logotype?
... there should be one somewhere with the text "provisional" or "proposed" superimposed on it.
On the first page of documentation I have this Caution: "Caution This is not yet an official Boost C++ library. It wasn't reviewed and can't be downloaded from www.boost.org. This beta is available to boost community to know real interest and get comments for refinement. The intention is to submit library to formal review, if community think that it is interesting!" That's not enough? Thanks a lot