11 Oct
2010
11 Oct
'10
5:01 a.m.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Daniel Walker <daniel.j.walker@gmail.com> wrote:
Finally, there have been suggestions to alter boost::function's exception safety guarantee directly through either policies or constructor options.
We used to have an Allocator parameter to the boost::function template and it was removed (just in time for this change to also be reflected in C++0x) to reduce coupling. Adding any policies to boost::function would undo all of the benefits of that change. Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode