Joel de Guzman wrote:
Matt Gruenke wrote:
Regarding your supporting point, if I'm using a Boost library, the place I'd look for usage information is the library's docs - not Wikipedia. Of course, if questions about the problem domain (or common solution practices) arise, when reading the library docs, I would obviously turn to other resources. So long as the library makes precise use of standard terminology, and carefully documents non-standard terminology when standard terminology is non-existent or cannot be used precisely, I see no problem.
That's not my point. Take a look at all the existing libraries that use concepts. Pick one; Vigra seems popular. Note: http://tinyurl.com/y3mgfn I see no "pixel format" there. Pick another one: http://tinyurl.com/18r. See the term "color space" again?
Oops. I wonder why tinyurl didn't pick that one. Try http://tinyurl.com/yye9tq. And see the term "color space". Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net