Andrey Semashev wrote:
I think, it would also make it possible to connect several backends with a single frontend and/or a common formatter, which was requested during the review. Yeah, that would be really cool :-) . Currently I am using the logging functionality provided by the Poco library (http://www.pocoproject.org). They have a chaining mechanism. This also includes splitters which distribute log records to several sub-chains.
In "my" scenario, I have a central filter (to block all trace messages, for instance), a single formatter, a splitter and then the backends (with their own filters). Regards, Roland PS: I did not even read half of all the mails of this review, but from what I saw, Boost.Log is going to make quite a leap if you follow up all the suggestions and discussions. I am very much looking forward to migrating as soon as the next version is available. Thanks for all the time and efforts you invest in this project!