on Mon Aug 05 2013, Sergey Cheban <s.cheban-AT-drweb.com> wrote:
On 05.08.2013 18:47, Dave Abrahams wrote:
I don't see why bumping a compiler requirement from one set of antiques to another slightly more recent set of antiques is an issue that needs to be suspended for a long time with so much red tape as user surveys. +1
You don't need user surveys. Please just commit the patches today and move on :). Let progress happen and get out of the way :).
+1
Ok, what about dropping the antique C++03? Do you know the current users' demands? I don't, really. So, I think that it would be interesting to see the survey results anyway.
Sure, they would be interesting, but IMO the benefits to Boost of making the change immediately outweigh the benefits of doing the survey. -- Dave Abrahams