20 Oct
2009
20 Oct
'09
12:41 a.m.
Am Tuesday 13 October 2009 01:57:16 schrieb Mateusz Loskot:
Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
I use detail name myself. Any better names for bucket with implementation details?
What about `namespace private_` ? Even if access won't be controlled by the compiler.
That's my favourite replacement.
how is "private" more meaningful than "detail"? private is a keyword defined by c++. detail is a namespace defined by boost. both names aren't meaningful or descriptive unless you know their definition. (.NET actually uses "private" and "public" and enforces it)