On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:44:42 +0100, Reece Dunn <msclrhd@hotmail.com> wrote:
Jeff Garland wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:00:52 +0400, Maxim Yegorushkin wrote
Recent postings showed interest in an immutable string facility [*]. Its interface and implementation has now reached a stable state (I hope).
I am formally requesting that const_string be added to the review queue. Wasn't there some discussion of merging this proposal with the fixed_string stuff and reviewing it together -- looks like that's been decided against?
I haven't heard anything against the merger.
Neither did I.
I am pro merger, since it will allow const_string, fixed_string and flex_string/basic_string_impl to all be reviewed as one since they have related functionality.
So, what specific steps should we make to merge it? -- Maxim Yegorushkin