Re: [boost] [outcome] Ternary logic -- need an example

Le 18/05/2017 à 16:41, Niall Douglas via Boost a écrit :

...

Also applies to other possible combinations such as expected, E2>, outcome>, and so on that can all in principle be flattened into a single variant under the hood.

Earlier Expected proposals had all sorts of useful semantics for nested expected. They have been removed from the most recent proposal.

Niall, are you talking of my proposals? If yes, could you recall me what was there and was removed? Best, Vicente