Re: [boost] [typeof][result_of] Separated at Birth?

On Jun 9, 2005, at 11:49 AM, David Abrahams wrote:

It seems to me that when BOOST_TYPEOF becomes available, boost::result_of should use it in its default implementation, something like:

template <class F, class A> struct result_of<F(A)> { typedef typename BOOST_TYPEOF(make<F>() ( make<A>() ) ) type; };

Is that in the plan?

Absolutely. Doug