11 Oct
2004
11 Oct
'04
11:33 a.m.
In-Reply-To: <97E47D90-1A3F-11D9-BF1C-003065D18932@twcny.rr.com> hinnant@twcny.rr.com (Howard Hinnant) wrote (abridged):
The second is a container of values which may be polymorphic. It would be a more-or-less drop-in replacement for vector<T>. It would not allow nulls, and the syntax would be like v.begin()->method(). Although it would probably use pointers behind the scenes, that would be an implementation detail not revealed by its interface.
I.e. a vector<T&> ?
That might be a reasonable syntax, yes. -- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK