Eric Niebler skrev:
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
We agreed long ago that range_begin() was the name of the customization point, because the Range concept is larger than Boost. Has that changed? And that is the problem: do you want to break the few boost libs in a development trunk, or break all clients out there? The names where settled for maybe two years ago.
Have you just changed the names of the adl hooks? There are lots of other breaking changes, like the changed meaning of range_iterator<>, the deprecation of range_result_iterator<> and the addition of range_mutable_iterator<>. And the behavior of range_end(char (&)[N]), too. Are you going to roll all of that back? If not, then you haven't really got a leg to stand on -- you're breaking clients anyway.
This change is a mistake. Please, back it out.
oK. Done. -Thorsten