Steven,
It sound to me like an order of initialization problem. What version of boost are you using? Can you try stepping through the initializtion of the boost::function<...> and watching the value especially of the vtable?
I was deep into stepping through the initialization and noticed that gdb was using two different funtion_template.hpp files ! I think there is conflict between my projects installation of 1.34.1 and the RedHat-supplied 1.32.0. Now to find someone here with root access... Does that seem reasonable? Thanks, Randy -----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Steven Watanabe Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:52 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [bind] segfault AMDG Ormond, Randy <Randy.Ormond <at> mdnt.com> writes:
Steven,
Thanks for the suggestions.
I don't see any recursion either. Does the simple example segfault? Can you post a *complete* program?
I wish I could.
Do these two variations segfault? this->MyClass::f(); boost::bind(&MyClass::f, this)()
Both of those are fine.
There's a clue here that would help me if I were smart enough. The segfault goes away if I change the order of linking the object files. Maybe a duplicate symbol but I haven't found it yet.
Thanks, Randy
It sound to me like an order of initialization problem. What version of boost are you using? Can you try stepping through the initializtion of the boost::function<...> and watching the value especially of the vtable? In Christ, Steven Watanabe _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost