Boost - Dev mailing list wrote
The formal review of Peter Dimov's Mp11 library is scheduled for July 15 - July 24, 2017 [1].
1. Should Mp11 be accepted into Boost? Please state all conditions for acceptance explicity.
Yes. Especially so if mp11 can be merged with the ideas from kvasir and brigand.
2. What is your evaluation of the design?
I like the design, it is elegant and easy to understand.
3. What is your evaluation of the implementation?
It is solid. I would like to see some improvement in the sort algorithm, however.
4. What is your evaluation of the documentation?
The documentation is well-written. Easy to read, making it easy to find the stuff you need.
5. What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
It would be very useful to me. I currently use the brigand library and find that library also very good. But if mp11 is acepted into boost, I will switch.
6. Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems?
No, due to time pressure, I did not have time to use the library.
7. How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
A quick reading this time. I have been following Peter Dimovs work for some years though, beginning with his introduction to template metaprogramming which was an eye-opener to me.
8. Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
I am somewhat knowledgeable as I have implemented a template-library (much more limited in scope) and thus have lots of knowledge about how not to do template meta programming. ;-) I am also a user of brigand, and use it a lot - as my current project is (ab)using templates all over the place. /Peter -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/review-mp11-Formal-review-of-Mp11-tp46968... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.