On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:37:52AM -0000, John Maddock wrote:
Jens Seidel wrote:
May I ask why you ignore your own bugs such as http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1454?
Apologies, I hadn't seen that report, I'll look into that.
OK, it is now fixed. But I did not get any mail about it (at least for this bug report). I miss also your last comment ("Previous fix was incomplete") and why didn't you get a mail about my initial bug report (or did you recieve it?). Is there a problem with trac and mails? PS: John, to avoid to miss other posts of you I just use this mail to send you a further trivial patch which corrects mostly wrong comments in your header inclusion file tests (did you not use libs/math/test/compile_test/generate.sh to generate these?). PS2: I still miss an explanation from you why you use both internal and external inclusion guards: boost/math/complex/asinh.hpp contains: #ifndef BOOST_MATH_COMPLEX_DETAILS_INCLUDED # include <boost/math/complex/details.hpp> #endif and boost/math/complex/details.hpp: #ifndef BOOST_MATH_COMPLEX_DETAILS_INCLUDED #define BOOST_MATH_COMPLEX_DETAILS_INCLUDED Is this just old code or was it necessary because of the asinh/asin typo and you did so for other files as well? I suggest to remove all outer include guards (also in other files). Jens