25 Jul
2006
25 Jul
'06
3:03 p.m.
"Chris Weed" <chrisweed@gmail.com> writes:
Hi, I think it would be nice to have a "nonconstructible" class to derive from similar to noncopyable.
Recently I was burned by a traits class that was getting constructed. I think this should also be used for template metafunctions.
I disagree, and strongly. Sometimes it's very useful to pass instances of these things around and I can't see any reason to prohibit it. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com