On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Stewart, Robert<Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Stewart, Robert<Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Stewart, Robert<Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
The warning may, in fact, be unreasonable, but the library author should do all possible to quiet the warning.
Why?
For the reasons I already gave.
To address someone's preference?
Come now. I gave more reasons than that one.
I think that you assume that the warning is reasonable and easy to fix, as with most warnings that could be silenced with casts. A lot of times, fixing such warnings is common sense. In that case, just a note to the library developer would be enough to have it fixed. But you can't generalize from this, to "all warnings should be silenced." Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode