Re: [boost] Bounded types (or maybe not 'bounded' anymore? ;-)

On 9/26/05 6:16 AM, "Robert Kawulak" <kawulak@student.agh.edu.pl> wrote:

The reason I was thinking so was "Exceptional C++" item 20 p.9 which says that postincrement operator should return a const value, from this I deduced that conversion operator should also. But as I mentioned, I didn't think of it a lot so I may be wrong ;-).

Actually, under my opinion/theory, NO function, member function, or operator returns a const non-reference. That's includes the post-increment operator. However, I don't have the "Exceptional C++" book, so I don't know the author's reasoning for his opinion. -- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com