On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
2) If you have to add a config flag, please match the CXX11 naming scheme and call it something like BOOST_NO_CXX11_RANGE_BASED_FOR
We are using the BOOST_NO_CXX11_ scheme for header files only. None of the 28 feature macros we already have use a BOOST_NO_CXX11_ prefix.
Seehttp://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_50_0/libs/config/doc/html/boost_config/boost...
Well, shame on us. I could argue about BOOST_NO_CXX11_SMART_PTR BOOST_NO_CXX11_ALLOCATOR BOOST_NO_CXX11_ATOMIC_SMART_PTR but those are "related to" header files. IM(NS)HO, these should all be BOOST_NO_CXX11 macros. For example, BOOST_NO_NULLPTR should be BOOST_NO_CXX11_NULLPTR (but we're not going to change that today) -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists@gmail.com> A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait). -- Yu Suzuki