7 Jul
2005
7 Jul
'05
1:30 p.m.
"Paul Mensonides" <pmenso57@comcast.net> writes:
version will pedantically use the term "function type" as defined by the standard and will not refer to a function pointer as being a function type!
That's fine with me. I only really commented to point out that there is no "member function type" as a distinct entity. I don't think that 'nonmember' is a property of a function type--it just doesn't make sense.
We're only talking about making it a property of a function _pointer_ type. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com