
10 Feb
2005
10 Feb
'05
4:56 p.m.
"Vinzenz Feenstra" <evilissimo@web.de> wrote
Hmm would be that "in-memory db" serializable ??
It's not at the moment, but it should be trivial to implement once there is a need. Of course, individual fields need to be serializable, and this is the user's responsibility. We had a naive serialization in place at some point, and then we removed it. If we do it again, it will most likely be done via the Boost Serialization library. Regards Arkadiy