On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:15:06 +0000 "Phil Endecott" <spam_from_boost_dev@chezphil.org> wrote:
I have yet to see any other objection to my focus on unlimited-size integers for an unlimited-size integer library.
That's odd, because my very first posts in this review focused on your code's unacceptably-poor performance for fixed-size integers. Here's what I wrote in my review: "Performance of small and fixed-length integers is poor. This could be resolved by storing fixed-length values on the stack, or by using some sort of small buffer optimisation."
I read that as an objection to the performance of the fixed-size integers, not an objection to the library itself because it focused on unlimited-size integers. -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * *