26 Aug
2012
26 Aug
'12
12:22 a.m.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Alexander Lamaison <awl03@doc.ic.ac.uk>wrote:
I would be fine if we could implement the RAII type in a platform-independent way but ...
We haven't found one ... yet but we certainly must before adding this library to Boost. Once it's in Boost it becomes 'cannon' and therefore much trickier to make the required changes. Before then we can screw around with the API as much as we like without worrying about breaking existing clients.
I agree with this. Oh by the way, is there a public repository for boost.process? Something that people wanting to try variations can clone? Joel Lamotte